Humility in your prayer life

7Likewise, husbands, live with your wives in an understanding way, showing honor to the woman as the weaker vessel, since they are heirs with you of the grace of life, so that your prayers may not be hindered. 1 Peter 3:7 ESV

Last summer I spent a few weeks studying 1 Peter. It was my first time ever truly reading the book (though I read it twice for New Testament survey the previous semester) and this is a verse that really jumped out at me. The insight I gained had little to do with marriage, however.

The last part of the verse says, “so that your prayers may not be hindered.” I remember reading that and thinking, “what the heck does that have to do with husbands living with their wives in an understanding way?” In my head, prayer had nothing to do with how you lived; it was just something you did with God in your spare time.

As I meditated on it, though, it suddenly started making sense. If a husband is treating his wife as if she’s weaker and less significant, he has elevated himself in his mind. Essentially, he has pride. A proud person thinks they have it figured out, so why would they need God? And specifically, in this verse, why would they need prayer? It’s as if there’s a relationship between pride and prayer.

Then in the next verse, Peter gives a list of things believers should have, and what’s the last one? “a humble mind.” 1 Peter 3:8. The first step to improving your prayer life… is a humble mind. Humility is a precondition for a healthy prayer life. Humility acknowledges our dependence on God.

If you want to improve your prayer life, begin developing a humble mind. Whenever you’re tempted to make a decision with your interests first, put someone else’s interests first. It will not only improve your relationship with that person, it just might also improve your relationship with God.

Share

Church fathers

My first time ever truly studying Church history was this past fall. I had heard about St. Augustine a little bit, but that was really it. My perception of Church history was about like this: The Church was thriving until the book of Acts ended, persecuted until Constantine, and then corrupt until Martin Luther.

As we studied the early Church fathers, I was blown away at their commitment to Christ and their knowledge of Scripture. Learning about them made Christianity so much more authentic to me. Our professor tried so hard to help our class realize that we are connected to a massive family of believers who have come before us. The more I read, the more I realized that since the start of the Church, there has been a faithful group of believers clinging to Orthodoxy (or defining it) and pursuing Christ. That was new to me, and it still gives me goose bumps.

I wonder if that’s something we could help teenagers grasp. If high school students understood they were connected to this giant movement that has been rolling since the beginning of the A.D. era, how could that change the seriousness of their faith? If we told teenagers more about what God has done in the past, and what he continues to do all across the world, how much more real would it seem to them?

Last Summer I was talking to a high school student who considers himself an atheist. He made a comment to me that seems relevant to this discussion. He said, “Here’s my problem with religion: it’s invalid because it’s geographical. Everybody’s religion goes along with where they were born. You’re a Christian because you were born in America. If you had been born in India… you’d probly be a Hindu… and need a shower.”

We laughed, and the conversation was over. But what I wish I could’ve explained was how wrong his assertion about Christianity was. Christianity is geographical, because Jesus said to take it to every nation, but it is not limited by geography. The reason I know about Jesus is because there was a long line of believers a long time ago who decided they were going to give their life for the sake of making Him famous, even if it meant they would die. And we are here today, in this generation, to continue that story.

The Church fathers are relevant today, and I think it would serve our churches well to talk about them. My professor wrote a book that would be a great resource for someone wanting to start learning about the Church fathers. For a link click HERE.

Share

Big-picture series planning

I hear a lot of sermons. I’m constantly going to church websites and checking out their current series. Most churches I follow do a great job of presenting their series in a compelling way. Most of the time, the messages have really good insight.

What’s always interesting to me about pastors, though, is how excited they get about a principle in a message or series, only to never mention that principle again. For example, if they were talking about priorities, they might end a big message by saying, “The way you spend your time is a direct reflection of what you value.” Everybody felt so moved. The preacher might get a hundred compliments between the stage and his car.

Inevitably, the next week rolls around and a new series has to start. Now he’s talking about something else. He’ll probably never preach the priorities message to this church again. So, what happens to that incredibly moving principle?

In my experience, it seems like a lot of churches just kind of float their way through series after series without any real sense of purpose. They get everybody energized about one series, and make comments about “how important this is”, only to introduce another important thing the next week. I always want to ask, “what happened to that important principle you shared 4 months ago?”

Churches are doing an incredible job of creating environments and mediums to share messages, but churches aren’t necessarily doing a great job of thinking through where their messages will lead people. Week to week, services are great. Week to week, messages are being communicated excellently. But what about year to year?

We have to ask questions like… Where are people going to end up in the long run as a result of our preaching? What will we have covered when we end this year?  How can we make sure to recycle important principles regularly? In what area do we want people to grow this year?

In my opinion (which, let’s be honest… really probably doesn’t mean much) a church that fails to ask these questions will have a lot of great Sundays, but they minimize their ability to implement change in people’s lives long term.

What’s your system for reiterating what’s important? How do you map out where you’re leading people?

Share

Followership development

They say great minds think a lot. Yesterday my dad posted about over-popularizing leadership and its negative effects. You can read that HERE. Ironically, I had this post scheduled to release next Wednesday, but for the sake of relevance, I’ve bumped it up to today.

Leadership is a popular subject. Everybody wants to be a leader. Everybody talks about “leadership development”. I can remember being in elementary school and having guest speakers come and talk to our class about “becoming a leader”.  The general message was that leaders make decisions, while followers just go along with whatever everybody else says.

The underlying basis for the challenge wasn’t really about leadership, though, the challenge was to be individuals. Leadership has been communicated as synonymous with independence and resistance to peer pressure. The more leadership is encouraged, the more people resist followership.

In our culture, admitting to be a follower is like admitting to be a loser. Pride is at stake when leadership comes up because of the negative stigma associated with following. Everybody’s desire to be a leader ultimately hurts harmony and progress.

The problem with all the leadership talk is obvious: not everyone can be a leader. In fact, not everybody even should be a leader. If everybody were a leader, nobody would be. A step further, if everybody wants to be the leader nobody will be.

If leadership is necessary (which we all know it is), then so is followership. In order for excellent leadership to take place, excellent followership must take place as well. Great followers help make great leaders by giving them opportunities to lead.

So here’s my question: In what areas can you embrace followership in order to strengthen the leadership in place? Despite the stigma, following does not entail passiveness. Following does not mean you’re giving into peer pressure. Followership is about strengthening leaders.

I think it would serve us well to learn the art of following. What are some excellent followership principles?

Share

Practical theology

I was having a conversation recently with a church leader I have the utmost respect for. We were talking about Bible schools, seminaries, and Christian education. During the conversation, she made a comment that was very interesting to me. She said in essence, “Most people who come into my office don’t want to talk about theology, they want to talk about their problems.”

The implication was that knowing where you stand on deep theological issues is great, but practically speaking, they won’t come up very often.

Shortly after this conversation, I was preaching a message to teenagers about obeying their parents.  The text I was using was Ephesians 6:1-3. Paul writes, “Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. “Honor your father and mother” (this is the first commandment with a promise), “that it may go well with you and that you may live long in the land.” Ephesians 6:1-3 (ESV)

 On the surface, preaching a message about obeying your parents is about as easy as it gets. No need for Bible school, seminary, or Christian education. But as I prepared, I realized there was a big theological issue at stake. Does the promise associated with honoring your parents still apply today? It would be easy to get up and tell teenagers, “Listen, you should obey your parents because if you do you’ll live a long and prosperous life.” But is that what Paul meant?

I ended up landing on the fact that this promise doesn’t apply today. I can explain that some other time, but here’s the point of this post: Our theology will shape how we respond to life. Theology may not be directly related to most of your conversations, but your theology is indirectly affecting every conversation. Because of this, it’s crucial for us to know what we believe, and why we believe it. People may not be asking about theology, but they are asking theological questions… whether they know it or not.

How have you seen this play out? Have you had a time when you recognized theology’s importance?

Share