My systematic theology professor last semester gave us an assignment that forced me to think critically about my theological convictions. The assignment was to take our view on a particular subject in systematic theology, and then analyze how our particular view should inform our ministry practice.
For example: If I believe in the inerrancy of Scripture, how should that inform the way I teach the Bible?
I think this discipline is critical for church leaders. Why? Our ministries should be shaped by our theological convictions.
Because of this, I think it’s interesting to consider why churches do church the way they do. What beliefs are informing their practice?
Here are some questions for consideration:
What theological conviction leads your church to do…
- Small groups or Sunday school?
- Seeker-sensitive or Insider-focused services?
- Contemporary or Traditional music?
- Verse-verse or Topical preaching?
- Missions the way you do it?
- Church membership the way you do it?
I think we’re doing a lot of stuff in the church just because we think it “works”. But what theological conviction helps us define what it means to “work”? You owe it to yourself and your ministry to think about these things. Unless you’re clear on why you’re doing what you’re doing, you’re setting yourself up to waste a lot of time and energy, and even worse, to lead your people and your ministry away from the truth that should be shaping your people and your ministry.
2 thoughts on “Theology and church practice”
You’re definitley onto something here. Church leadership is far too often defined by simple pragmatism. Even then, the whole “it works” mentality is often extremely subjective and based on numerical measurements moreso than transformation.
It looks like this post is giving us a preview of what’s to come on the blog? I hope so!